User Tools

Site Tools


en:ahr:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:ahr:start [2013/12/02 11:17]
legatum [Hoppe, J.]
en:ahr:start [2014/03/05 09:30] (current)
legatum [The AMERICAN HOMOEOPATHIC REVIEW.]
Line 3: Line 3:
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
 This collection of texts is a result of [[en:​homeopublish|Project HomeoPublish]].\\ This collection of texts is a result of [[en:​homeopublish|Project HomeoPublish]].\\
 +Please [[en:​contribute#​donate|donate]] to keep it going.
 +
 Also see [[en:​resources|other resources]] available as a part of [[en:​about|Legatum Homeopathicum effort]]. Also see [[en:​resources|other resources]] available as a part of [[en:​about|Legatum Homeopathicum effort]].
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
 ===== INTRODUCTION. ===== ===== INTRODUCTION. =====
  
-In the spring of 1858, there was dissatisfaction expressed by a large number of homeopathic physicians in the US that the //North American Journal of Homoeopathy//​ (the only professional homeopathic periodical at the time, in the US) was approving and publishing contributions which were not in line with the idea of homeopathy as taught by Hahnemann. The situation was remedied by the foundation of the American Homeopathic Review whose editors proposed to //"​issuing one that should advocate a strict adherence to the homoeopathic law, although acknowledging the right or every physician to prescribe the remedies in such quantities as his experience or judgment dictated."//​+In the spring of 1858, there was dissatisfaction expressed by a large number of homeopathic physicians in the US that the //North American Journal of Homoeopathy//​ (the only professional homeopathic periodical at the time, in the US) was approving and publishing contributions which were not in line with the idea of homeopathy as taught by Hahnemann. The situation was remedied by the foundation of the American Homeopathic Review whose editors proposed to //"​issuing one that should advocate a strict adherence to the homoeopathic law, although acknowledging the right of every physician to prescribe the remedies in such quantities as his experience or judgment dictated."//​
  
 In October 1858, the first number of the Review appeared under the auspices of R. G. Perkins and H. M. Smith as editors and proprietors. Themselves unknown to the homoeopathic profession, the editors sought and received the literary assistance of the more noted of homeopathic physicians, as E. Bayard, J. P. Dake, **//C. Dunham//**, **//B. Fincke//**, L. Hallock, **//C. Hering//**, **//B. F. Joslin//**, **//B. F. Joslin, Jr.//**, E. M. Kellogg, **//A. Lippe//**, R. Ludlam, E. E. Marcy, H. D. Paine, M. J. Rhees, G. Shipman, F. Vanderburgh,​ **//P. P. Wells//** and others. Also included were translations of the important articles by **//C. von Boenninghausen//​** and other selected articles appearing in the German homeopathic journal Allgemeine Homoeopatische Zeitung. In October 1858, the first number of the Review appeared under the auspices of R. G. Perkins and H. M. Smith as editors and proprietors. Themselves unknown to the homoeopathic profession, the editors sought and received the literary assistance of the more noted of homeopathic physicians, as E. Bayard, J. P. Dake, **//C. Dunham//**, **//B. Fincke//**, L. Hallock, **//C. Hering//**, **//B. F. Joslin//**, **//B. F. Joslin, Jr.//**, E. M. Kellogg, **//A. Lippe//**, R. Ludlam, E. E. Marcy, H. D. Paine, M. J. Rhees, G. Shipman, F. Vanderburgh,​ **//P. P. Wells//** and others. Also included were translations of the important articles by **//C. von Boenninghausen//​** and other selected articles appearing in the German homeopathic journal Allgemeine Homoeopatische Zeitung.
en/ahr/start.1385983071.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/12/02 11:17 by legatum