en:hphys:lippe-ad-clinical-reflections-037-039
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:hphys:lippe-ad-clinical-reflections-037-039 [2015/04/26 11:56] legatum |
en:hphys:lippe-ad-clinical-reflections-037-039 [2015/04/29 06:13] legatum |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Just in such very grave cases does our true healing-art show itself to the greatest advantage, and it never becomes necessary to fly to other means than those offered us inside of our exclusive school of therapeutics. Shall we listen to the seductive voice of public teachers who in such cases claim that it is not only the duty, but the privilege of the homoeopathic physician to administer massive doses of //Quinine// to prevent a possibly fatal return of such a chill? We positively decline to listen to such weak teachers! If we are true to Homoeopathy it will be true to us - that is our experience; no matter how men may bluster who never tried the experiment. Let them say that a case like this was not cured by the homoeopathic remedy faithfully administered; let them say that the curative virtue of medicines is limited to a certain fixed potency; let them call us hide-bound transcendentalists; let them babble about the absurdities of an exclusive dogma and the limits to the applicability of homoeopathic practice, all of it will not do away with //facts,// stubborn facts. Such talk only proves the utter incompetency of a set of illogical and ignorant fault-finders, whose only desire is to drag the noble healing-art and the healers down into the detestable mire of eclecticism, which suits them well. | Just in such very grave cases does our true healing-art show itself to the greatest advantage, and it never becomes necessary to fly to other means than those offered us inside of our exclusive school of therapeutics. Shall we listen to the seductive voice of public teachers who in such cases claim that it is not only the duty, but the privilege of the homoeopathic physician to administer massive doses of //Quinine// to prevent a possibly fatal return of such a chill? We positively decline to listen to such weak teachers! If we are true to Homoeopathy it will be true to us - that is our experience; no matter how men may bluster who never tried the experiment. Let them say that a case like this was not cured by the homoeopathic remedy faithfully administered; let them say that the curative virtue of medicines is limited to a certain fixed potency; let them call us hide-bound transcendentalists; let them babble about the absurdities of an exclusive dogma and the limits to the applicability of homoeopathic practice, all of it will not do away with //facts,// stubborn facts. Such talk only proves the utter incompetency of a set of illogical and ignorant fault-finders, whose only desire is to drag the noble healing-art and the healers down into the detestable mire of eclecticism, which suits them well. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ====== DOCUMENT DESCRIPTOR ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Source: | The Homoeopathic Physician Vol. 02 No. 01, 1881, pages 037-039 | | ||
| + | ^ Description: | CLINICAL REFLECTIONS | | ||
| + | ^ Remedies: | Natrium muriaticum | | ||
| + | ^ Author: | Lippe, Ad. | | ||
| + | ^ Year: | 1882 | | ||
| + | ^ Editing: | errors only; interlinks; formatting | | ||
| + | ^ Attribution: | Legatum Homeopathicum | | ||
en/hphys/lippe-ad-clinical-reflections-037-039.txt · Last modified: 2015/04/29 06:13 by legatum
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
