en:objrep
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
en:objrep [2013/01/13 15:17] gaforka |
en:objrep [2013/03/08 12:40] legatum |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
| etc.\\ | etc.\\ | ||
| + | {{anchor:objrep_adv}} | ||
| ===== The advantages of Object Repertory compared to traditional repertories ===== | ===== The advantages of Object Repertory compared to traditional repertories ===== | ||
| Line 231: | Line 232: | ||
| Estimated duration of development of advanced algorithms: 6 months\\ | Estimated duration of development of advanced algorithms: 6 months\\ | ||
| Estimated costs of development of advanced algorithms: 40 000 EUR | Estimated costs of development of advanced algorithms: 40 000 EUR | ||
| - | ==== Phase 6: Further development of ONTNET. ==== | + | ==== Phase 6: Further development of ONTNET ==== |
| Further optional development ONTNET would consist of working on improving the integrity and relationships of ONTNET points with the aim of improving the total usability of the object repertory. In theory, this work is indefinite, therefore the range of such work can only be considered in face of practical considerations and when such point of the project development is reached. | Further optional development ONTNET would consist of working on improving the integrity and relationships of ONTNET points with the aim of improving the total usability of the object repertory. In theory, this work is indefinite, therefore the range of such work can only be considered in face of practical considerations and when such point of the project development is reached. | ||
en/objrep.txt · Last modified: 2013/03/13 16:14 by legatum
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
