User Tools

Site Tools


en:studie

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
en:studie [2013/01/21 22:07]
pistus animals
en:studie [2013/02/25 20:59]
pistus
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 Bornhöft G. et al. "​Effectiveness,​ safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice -- summarized health technology assessment."​ Forsch Komplementmed. 2006;13 Suppl 2:19-29. Epub 2006 Jun 26. -- [[http://​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pubmed/​16883077|http://​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pubmed/​16883077]] Bornhöft G. et al. "​Effectiveness,​ safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice -- summarized health technology assessment."​ Forsch Komplementmed. 2006;13 Suppl 2:19-29. Epub 2006 Jun 26. -- [[http://​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pubmed/​16883077|http://​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pubmed/​16883077]]
 +
 +
 +//​__comments on Bornhöft study:​__// ​
 +    ​
 +//Shaw DM. The Swiss report on homeopathy: a case study of research misconduct. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 May 31;​142:​w13594. [[http://​www.smw.ch/​content/​smw-2012-13594/​]] //
 +
 +//Reply to Shaw DM: von Ammon K, Bornhöft G, Maxion-Bergemann S, Righetti M, Baumgartner S,​Thurneysen A, Wolf U, Matthiessen PF. Familiarity,​ objectivity - and misconduct: Counterstatement to Shaw DM. The Swiss Report on homoeopathy:​ a case study of research misconduct. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;​142:​w13594. [[http://​www.smw.ch/​content/​smw-2013-13720/​]] //
 +
 +**Meta-analysis of financial costs**
 +
 +Viksveen P, Dymitr Z, Simoens S. Economic evaluations of homeopathy: a review. Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Feb 10.([[http://​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pubmed/​23397477]])
 +
  
 ==== Effects of highly-diluted substances on animals ==== ==== Effects of highly-diluted substances on animals ====
en/studie.txt · Last modified: 2013/03/27 13:01 by pistus