en:ahr:bayes-w-question-on-doses-reply-to-dr-lippe-158-10354
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:ahr:bayes-w-question-on-doses-reply-to-dr-lippe-158-10354 [2012/07/12 10:55] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
en:ahr:bayes-w-question-on-doses-reply-to-dr-lippe-158-10354 [2012/07/16 10:22] (current) legatum |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== A QUESTION ON DOSES, REPLY TO DR. LIPPE====== | ====== A QUESTION ON DOSES, REPLY TO DR. LIPPE====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| {{anchor:s2}}BY WILLIAM BAYES, M. D., CAMBRIDGE, ENG. | {{anchor:s2}}BY WILLIAM BAYES, M. D., CAMBRIDGE, ENG. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| {{anchor:s3}}In the November number of the REVIEW, Dr. Lippe has professed to answer a paper addressed by me to Mr. Wilson, commenting on a "case of severe and complicated pneumonia, with remarks on a characteristic indication for the selection of Lycopodium," reported by him at page 420 of the <span grade2>Monthly Homoeopathic Review,</span> of England. | {{anchor:s3}}In the November number of the REVIEW, Dr. Lippe has professed to answer a paper addressed by me to Mr. Wilson, commenting on a "case of severe and complicated pneumonia, with remarks on a characteristic indication for the selection of Lycopodium," reported by him at page 420 of the <span grade2>Monthly Homoeopathic Review,</span> of England. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
| {{anchor:s22}}3d. {{anchor:s23}}He professes to believe that acute dysentery ought to be treated by <span grade2>one single dose of Mercurius corr. {{anchor:s24}}Sub.<sup>2</sup></span><sup>00</sup> | {{anchor:s22}}3d. {{anchor:s23}}He professes to believe that acute dysentery ought to be treated by <span grade2>one single dose of Mercurius corr. {{anchor:s24}}Sub.<sup>2</sup></span><sup>00</sup> | ||
| - | {{anchor:s25}}It is infantile in Dr. Lippe to say, that the answer to my question, as to "why pneumonia, pleurisy and dysentery are all to be treated on different principles?" is to be found in the case itself. {{anchor:s26}}Equally absurd was it in Dr. Hewitt, another of Mr. Wilson's apologists, to say that the <span grade2>Organon</span> answers all these questions. {{anchor:s27}}I repeat that these diverse modes of administration shew an utter want <span grade2>of faith</span> on the part of Mr. Wilson. | + | {{anchor:s25}}It is infantile in Dr. Lippe to say, that the answer to my question, as to "why pneumonia, pleurisy and dysentery are all to be treated on different principles?" is to be found in the case itself. {{anchor:s26}}Equally absurd was it in Dr. Hewitt, another of Mr. Wilson's apologists, to say that the <span grade2>Organon</span> answers all these questions. {{anchor:s27}}I repeat that these diverse modes of administration shew an utter <span grade2>want of faith</span> on the part of Mr. Wilson. |
| {{anchor:s28}}If olfaction will cure a case of pleurisy in five hours, ought Mr. Wilson to have been content to cure a case of acute pneumonia, <span grade2>with frequently repeated doses,</span> in nearly three times as many days? {{anchor:s29}}Or, if a case of acute dysentery is cured by <span grade2>one single dose,</span> ought a case of pneumonia to be treated by doses frequently repeated. | {{anchor:s28}}If olfaction will cure a case of pleurisy in five hours, ought Mr. Wilson to have been content to cure a case of acute pneumonia, <span grade2>with frequently repeated doses,</span> in nearly three times as many days? {{anchor:s29}}Or, if a case of acute dysentery is cured by <span grade2>one single dose,</span> ought a case of pneumonia to be treated by doses frequently repeated. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 50: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ====== DOCUMENT DESCRIPTOR ====== | ====== DOCUMENT DESCRIPTOR ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ^ Source: | The American Homoeopathic Review Vol. 04 No. 09, 1864, pages 411-414 | | ^ Source: | The American Homoeopathic Review Vol. 04 No. 09, 1864, pages 411-414 | | ||
| ^ Description: | Question on Doses, Reply to Dr. Lippe | | ^ Description: | Question on Doses, Reply to Dr. Lippe | | ||
| + | ^ Remedies: | Lycopodium clavatum | | ||
| ^ Author: | Bayes, W. | | ^ Author: | Bayes, W. | | ||
| ^ Year: | 1864 | | ^ Year: | 1864 | | ||
| ^ Editing: | errors only; interlinks; formatting | | ^ Editing: | errors only; interlinks; formatting | | ||
| ^ Attribution: | Legatum Homeopathicum | | ^ Attribution: | Legatum Homeopathicum | | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
en/ahr/bayes-w-question-on-doses-reply-to-dr-lippe-158-10354.1342090522.txt.gz · Last modified: 2012/07/16 10:18 (external edit)
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
